LGBT+ Inclusion in STEM grant holders in the spotlight at upcoming Inclusion and Diversity Forum
Winners of LGBT+ Inclusion in STEM grants are to share the results of their research into attrition and retention of LGBT+ scientists at our upcoming Inclusion and Diversity Forum.
The £485,000 programme saw five transatlantic partnerships of STEM and social science researchers explore how we can progress policy changes to support the LGBT+ STEM community.
Collaborators across the UK and the US joined up as part of the one-of-a-kind programme that used qualitative and quantitative methods in a bid to tackle the issue of underrepresentation of LGBT+ groups in STEM disciplines.
Representatives from each of the academic collaborations will present findings and recommendations at the latest edition of our I&D Forum at Burlington House on 25 March.
What do we mean by LGBT+?
LGBT is an acronym used to represent lesbian, gay, bi and trans people.
The ‘+’ is intended to ensure that the community, and related inclusion and diversity work, is inclusive of those with marginalised orientations and identities who may not identify with the specific terms of lesbian, gay, bi, or trans.
Identities that the ‘+’ speaks to include (but are not limited to) intersex, queer, questioning, asexual and pansexual.
The LGBT+ Inclusion in STEM research projects, which kicked off in summer 2023, are funded by the UK's Department of Science, Innovation and Technology (DSIT).
The scheme saw us partner with DSIT and the US-based Science and Technology Network (STN, which was known as the Science and Innovation Network until February 2025). It also marked the first time UK-US government agencies, NGOs, university administrations, researchers, and funders had been brought together to tackle the issue.
The research phase of the scheme formally concluded at the end of December 2024, with each of the projects taking a unique look at a particular aspect of LGBT+ attrition and retention in STEM.
All five chosen projects have differing areas of focus but were all selected to receive funding as they were considered to contribute towards making the scientific community more diverse and inclusive.
Findings
The mix of qualitative and quantitative research methods allowed a nuanced approach and highlighted the diversity of opinions among the LGBT+ STEM community. Despite their different focuses, common themes emerged from the studies.
The project led by Prof Latu (Queen’s University Belfast) showcased that although symbols, such as rainbow flags or pronoun badges, can show genuine support, they can also be perceived as performative or hypocritical – participants highlighted the need for actions alongside displays of symbols to create genuinely inclusive environments.
One online survey respondent said: "Seeing an inclusion symbol on a door or a sign that says 'all are welcome' makes me feel much safer and welcomed. I don't feel unsafe or unwelcomed just because I don't see these symbols, but I have a reassuring feeling instantly when seeing them."
Participants from the study led by Dr Reggiani (University of Strathclyde) pointed out that institutions often take 'passive' and performative approaches when addressing equality, diversity and inclusion issues, rather than focusing on accountability, addressing structural barriers, and providing tangible support.
A member of one focus group said: "In the past, a rainbow flag meant a queer person or a well-educated ally; now universities hand them out so much they mean nothing. I’ve heard awful comments from staff wearing a rainbow lanyard. It’s diluted the meaning."
Meanwhile, the project led by Prof Powell (University of Lincoln) articulated how LGBT+ individuals’ workplace experiences vary widely from very positive to hostile and exclusionary. Many who had positive experiences describe themselves ‘lucky’.
When discrimination does occur in the workplace, it is often perceived to be dealt with inappropriately or ineffectively. This was seen to have significant consequences, leading to people having to leave their place of work, as well as impacting mental health.
However, another online survey respondent noted: "When trans hostile jokes and language are used at work, I have never seen a single person challenge it other than trans people. It makes me scared to bother advocating for myself or to be identified as trans."
The study led by Prof Hughes (Montana State University) looking at LGBT+ STEM leavers showed that in many cases participants were facing other kinds of barriers, especially those related to disability status and race or ethnicity, and that the LGBT+ climate in STEM simply exacerbated their discontent with their learning or working conditions.
The project led by Dr Horton (Oxford Brookes University) highlighted that trans people often face additional barriers, such as higher rates of homelessness, medical issues, and discrimination, that mean they aren’t on a level playing field with cis people.
"I feel like one thing that isn't addressed enough in queer spaces is how those of us with intersectional identities, particularly as women of color (cis and trans) have to navigate our multifaceted identities. As a person of color, it can feel isolating how white queer spaces can feel," said one online survey respondent.
Findings from Dr Horton’s (Oxford Brookes University) project revealed participants feel the overall climate in the UK and the US is getting worse for LGBT+ people, especially trans people. This is leading to stress and feeling unsafe, which has a knock-on effect on their ability to do their jobs.
Prof Powell’s study at the University of Lincoln also found workplace experiences are directly and indirectly influenced by the wider policy context, societal attitudes and behaviours towards the LGBT+ community. The current environment - which can be hostile, especially for the trans community - shapes workplace experiences, including overall wellbeing and the desire and motivation to stay in an organisation.
One focus group participant said: "I live in constant stress because of it - I think a lot of us do. The future is pretty scary right now, and I definitely think the side effect of that is this sense of existential stress that people who aren't in this community probably don't have to deal with."
"It’s not the people I work with, but the current constant barrage of hate in the media and politics makes me very paranoid at work now," added one online survey respondent.
Learn more about the grants at next week's I&D Forum
An interactive panel discussion will follow presentations from the recipients of LGBT+ Inclusion in STEM grants. This will give the audience a deeper insight into what the research findings could mean for the future of LGBT+ inclusion in STEM.
The talks will play a key part in proceedings at our Inclusion and Diversity Forum, which will give participants in London and joining via live stream the chance to engage with new research and share best practices to support the LGBT+ community.
As well as hearing from the grant recipients and other keynote speakers, the event will also see the winners of the 2024 Inclusion and Diversity Prize, Discovery Planet CIC, receive their medals during a special presentation.
Some of the other highlights of a packed programme of events include:
- Dr Victoria Mason's talk and medal presentation to mark Discovery Planet CIC's 2024 RSC Inclusion and Diversity Prize win
- Flash presentations from six Inclusion and Diversity Fund beneficiaries.
- A pair of plenary talks and a summary presentation focusing on our work on disability and accessibility.
There will also be networking opportunities for anyone who attends in person or who joins online.
Our work on inclusion and diversity
Explore the full array of reports, resources and activities in the I&D space by visiting our dedicated I&D hub.
Contact us
- Email:
- Inclusion and Diversity team
Press office
- Tel:
- +44 (0) 20 7440 3351
- Email:
- Send us an email